Minnesotans For Sustainability©


Sustainable:  A society that balances the environment, other life forms, and human interactions over an indefinite time period.




Bigger Isnít Better In The Public Schools

Albert A. Bartlett*
January 28, 2002

Sunday's Camera (June 20, 1999) printed a collection of some two dozen essays by Boulder County teenagers expressing their views on violence in society. These essays were motivated by the tragic killings of students and a teacher at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado earlier in the year. The essays were excellent.

One particularly perceptive teenager got straight to the heart of the matter when she wrote:

I would not blame the school board, or the protection of the school
itself, but the size of the school population. When there are around 2,000
kids crammed into one building and 30 or so kids in each class, there are
bound to be some serious problems that go unnoticed ... I go to a school
that has around 100 students total. The main focus of our school is
'community.' We focus our energy to meet everyone, feel equal to everyone
(including the teachers and students), to get to understand each others
views on different subjects, and to feel welcome and accepted ... Since our
school is so small, we can have all-school discussions where everyone can
be heard.

This student sees what many of our community leaders choose not to see.

She recognizes that bigness in societal groups is the catalyst that causes breakup of the big population into smaller separate sub-populations based on the membersí views of shared problems, values, and "solutions."

Another student wrote: "When a student seems to be taking a U-turn with their school work, someone should be concerned." The bigger the school the less likely this is to happen.

Another student made the observation: "I believe that giving a sufficient amount of personal attention to today's youth would be a forward step to ending teen violence." This student is calling for the personal attention that is diminished and destroyed by bigness in our schools.

Another student observed that: "Most of these teenagers attend public schools where a single teacher may have as many as 150 to 200 students in one semester, leaving them barely enough time to even memorize their names. I believe a reasonable solution to this problem would be to hire more teachers in the public schools, allowing for smaller classes."

It is clear that these young people recognize that bigness is the central cause of the problem.

"I mean half of the kids out of 26 kids in my entire eighth grade class ... are leaving to go [next year] to either Boulder, Fairview, or Niwot, all public high schools. At our school we are so close we are like sisters and brothers. When the shootings happened at Columbine, it scared the life out of us because we, or our friends, are going to [these big] public high schools next year."

Yet another perceptive student wrote: "The solution I can think of for schools is advisor programs, where kids at first get comfortable with an adult. Trust is built and friendships are made. The advisor has a group of no more that 15 kids, so there is more one-on-one attention. When one of the kids is having trouble, the advisor can do something about it before something happens. At the school I go to, we have an advisor program. I know it works, because I use it every day."

Another student, from a larger school wrote: "If schools were able to hire more counselors, it would give them more time with the students. For every 75 students there should be one counselor... The schools should have it so there would be only about eighteen students in a class. That way, you get more one-on-one time with your teachers. A smaller class gives the teacher
a chance to get to know their students and then they might be able to notice if something is not right. The students even have a chance to get to know each other."

Another student observed: "The answer is not putting metal detectors in every doorway. The answer is not banning all violent games. The answer is not as easy as that... I mourn for this country as we try to open up our eyes and see that everything isn't okay, and that each one of us is responsible. I mourn."

The common thread of the impersonality of bigness runs through many of these excellent essays. The bigness has its cause in two obvious things: the first is population growth in our communities, and the second is the belief in the economies of scale that are alleged to result from making our schools, especially our high schools, larger and larger.

For many in the community, population growth is synonymous with the "healthy economy." And, as they have said so frequently, our community leaders are determined to maintain a "healthy economy." It has been amply demonstrated that their continuing success will mean larger schools, larger classes, less personal attention for students, and, predictably, more

As for the alleged economies of scale in large schools vs. small schools, we need to look not only at the bottom line of the financial managers, but we need to look at the real bottom line, the community outcome. I believe people are beginning seriously to question the conventional wisdom about the efficacy of bigger schools.

This collection of essays by teenagers in the Camera opened with the headline question, "Is the deck stacked against America's youth having a peaceful future?" If we continue our commitment to a "healthy economy" as it is presently perceived and defined, the answer almost certainly is YES.

The annual loss of a few students and teachers is a small price to pay for the continued annual growth of the Gross Local Product.

* Used with permission of the author.
This is a slightly lengthened version of a Guest Editorial published
in the Boulder Daily Camera, (Boulder, Colorado) June 26, 1999, Pg. 11A.


Please send mail to webmaster@mnforsustain.org with questions or comments about this web site. Minnesotans For Sustainability (MFS) is not affiliated with any government body, private, or corporate entity. Copyright © 2002 Minnesotans For Sustainability